|
Just so you know, it may surprise you that I'm not excited about the national election results, after all the party I usually vote for won big. However, I'm a big supporter of Federal gridlock. I don't like having a working Washington. I believe that the states should have more say on what happens in an area than the Feds. After all, what works in CA won't necessarily work in UT and I really dislike the East coast forcing its will on the West. The US is too big for "one size fits all" legislation. More should be the responsibility of the states. I agree that we need the Feds for things like air traffic control, the military, and foreign affairs. I really wouldn’t want Florida working out a trade agreement with Cuba or even see the one that California works out with Mexico. I’m pretty sure most of you wouldn’t like a lot of the trade laws that Utah would have with places so I can see the need for a Federal government to work out interstate trade disputes. But I do feel that the Feds have gone too far and have demonstrated the adage “the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.”
I mean really, when they declared the lynx an endangered species and started putting tracking collars on them in Montana they ran out of collars and then ordered more. Finally, someone had the brains to check what was happening to the collared cats (EPA workers were convinced that ranchers were removing the collars). Lo and behold, most of the collared cats were wandering around in Canada. Seems that the brilliant ding-a-ling that convinced Congress lynx were endangered was sure that the animals didn’t cross the border and that her computer model showed that based on the number of cats in Canada, there should be more in Montana. And don’t even get me started on the computer model that was the Mexican spotted owl - if they ever find that the computer was right and find one, I’m sure they’ll arrest more tractors.
I would feel better if the Democrats had won control of the Senate. Although many of my military friends tell me that they’re glad to see Daschle go. To be quite honest, I would have loved a tie and had the House declare Bush President and the Senate declare Edwards the Vice-President, which to me would have been perfect - Four years of accomplishing nothing.
I do feel better that it was a record number of voters. I do believe in the Democratic Republic and feel that their should be a balance in representation between small and large states (thus not a true democracy of the individual voter), but it makes me feel better to know that more people came out in what are commonly referred to as "the fly over states." As much as the coasts would like to forget us, we are the majority of the people affected by what is inflicted upon us by Washington (and Hollywood). We may not be the most populous states but we do matter and we do vote and we do have the right to have our voices heard and not ignored. I had one person in my precinct express that he was glad his neighbors hadn't come out to vote because he knew they were in a different party from him. I was sorry that they hadn't (and I'm sure that the poll watcher did call them) I don't mind losing when everyone votes, I don't like it when there is an unfair advantage to one side or the other. The Electoral College is not an unfair advantage; it's a leveling of the playing field and if you aren't able to inspire your party to come out and support you, then you don't deserve to win because you haven't demonstrated the leadership ability to have the office. I just worry that in this day and age of electronic media; leadership ability translates into screen presence and manipulation by the proper handlers.
|